Official Google statements about ranking factors
Last week Google's Matt Cutts gave an interview in which he revealed some things that will help webmasters to better optimize their websites. Here are the most important things that Matt Cutts said in the interview:
1. The more relevant links you have, the more pages of your site will be indexed
Matt Cutts said that the number of pages that Google indexes from your website is roughly proportional to the PageRank of your website. That means that more pages of your website will be indexed if your website has many inbound links.
Google does not have an indexation cap, i.e. they will index all pages of your website if you have enough inbound links. Remember that the PageRank that Google uses in its ranking algorithm is not the PageRank that is displayed in Google's toolbar.
2. Slow servers can cause problems
If Google can only crawl two pages at any given time due to a slow server, Google can set some sort of upper bound on how many pages they will fetch from that host server. This can be a problem for websites that are hosted on shared or slow servers.
3. Duplicate content can cause problems
"Imagine we crawl three pages from a site, and then we discover that the two other pages were duplicates of the third page. We'll drop two out of the three pages and keep only one, and that’s why it looks like it has less good content."
As mentioned above, Google will index your web pages based on the PageRank of your pages. If you have duplicate content, some pages of your website will be discarded and you'll waste ranking opportunities.
A new Google penalty? What can you do against it?
Webmasters in online forums reported an unusual Google behavior. New web pages of some sites are indexed with a longer delay. Is it a new Google penalty? Or is it just a bug that affects only certain websites?
What is the exact problem?
The websites that reported the problem were used to immediate inclusion of their pages in Google's search results.
If your website has a certain number of inbound links and if it has been indexed by Google, Google usually indexes new pages very quickly. That does not mean that the new pages get high rankings for any keyword but that the new pages can be found in Google's results if you search for the exact web page title or other unique elements that appear on the new web page.
These websites that were used to immediate inclusion now observed a 7 day delay for new website content:
"My blog has been afloat for almost 1.5 years, was always indexed by Google fast and smooth, and was ranked pretty high by main keywords in its niche. However, it's been several weeks that Google seems to have stopped indexing my new posts. [...]
It seems as if [Google is] applying an algorithm like 'posting day + 7 days' or something when indexing my new posts."
Is this really a new Google penalty? What can you do against it?
Many of the web pages that have the 7 day indexing problem are Wordpress blogs. There are several theories why these blogs aren't indexed as quickly as before:
1. The affected websites all seem to use the same SEO plugin for Wordpress that screws up the code and prevents Google from indexing the website pages correctly.
If you use an SEO plugin, consider if you really need it. These plugins don't do real SEO. They hide certain pages on your website from search engine spiders and they allow you to edit the header information of your web pages. This can also be done through the regular Wordpress interface.
2. Although the new blog post wasn't listed for 7 days on Google, the index page of the blog was listed in Google's search results.
As the index page of a blog often shows the latest blog posts, it is likely that Google uses the 7 day delay for the blog page because the post can only be found on the blog index page during that time.
3. Some of the affected blogs publish press releases on their websites. As the same press release can also be found on many other websites, Google might return the first publisher of the press release in the search results and discard all other pages with the same content.
4. Other affected websites seem to be AdSense scraper websites. These websites have very little unique content and they have been built to attract visitors that then click on the AdSense ads on the website.
5. Some of the affected websites installed user agent sniffers on their server. These programs return different pages to different user agents (human web surfers, Googlebot and other bots).
Using such a script on your server can easily prevent Google's indexing robot from indexing your website and it can be misinterpreted as a spamming (cloaking) attempt. This is very similar to the SEO plugin problem above.
It looks as if the 7 day delay might be related to two different website types: websites that use server scripts that return different pages to different user agents and websites that contain little or no unique content.
The 7 day delay for blogs that display the content both on the blog index page and the blog posting page is not a penalty but a Google feature that prevents duplicate results.
Google robotIf your website is a Made-For-AdSense scraper website then it's probably time to think about a new business model. Google might give these websites lower rankings in the future.
If you use bot blocking scripts or other server scripts that change the content that is delivered to visitors of your website then you should make sure that you're not accidentally blocking Google. It's better not to use these scripts at all.
San Francisco, Los Angeles, San Diego, Orange County, Sacramento, El Dorado Hills, Roseville, Granite Bay, Rocklin, Lincoln, Loomis, Elk Grove, Natomas, Citrus Heights, Folsom, Fair Oaks, Auburn, Placerville, Lodi, Stockton, Modesto, Galt, Tracy, Plumas Lake, Marysville, Yuba City, Chico, Redding, Red Bluff, Vacaville, Woodland, Davis, Dixon, Fairfield, Nevada City, San Jose, Sunnyvale, Palo Alto, Los Gatos, Mountain View, Santa Clara, Cupertino, Reno, Sparks, Tahoe, Lake Tahoe, South Lake Tahoe, Truckee, Toledo, Oregon, Cleveland, Detroit, Charlotte, Cornelius, Gastonia, Concord, Hickory, Salisbury, Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, Greensboro, Winston-Salem, High Point, New York, Boston, Chicago, Miami
View the Original article
Wednesday, May 19, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment